Re: [SBB] Steven's Creek Park / Villa Maria picnic area final

[Bill Bousman <[[email protected]]>]

Folks:

I've not been over to the park lately, so this thread is a bit difficult 
for me to follow.  The Parks and Recreation Department web site has a map 
of the park: 
http://www.sccgov.org/SCC/docs%2FParks%20and%20Recreation%2C%20Department%20of%20%28DEP%29%2Fattachments%2FStevensCreekGuideFinal.pdf
and it is clear that there are private holdings above the Villa Maria 
Picnic area, but the old orchard is shown to be completely on park 
land.  As for there being a "deer trail" the map shows two trails going 
into the private holdings.  These are not deer trails.  My recollection of 
at least one of them is that it is used by the private owners to obtain 
easy access to the park and there is a sign on the their property 
line.  Maybe Bob Power could talk to Tamara again.  I don't want to be 
offensive, but she needs to get in her park car and drive up there and take 
a look around.  Her description and those that everyone else are giving 
simply do not agree with the park map.  I think we need some clarity, but 
we don't have it yet.  What is probably most needed are signs on the 
private property owner's land that they are not welcome in our park unless 
they drive in on the road and pay the **** fee!

Bill

At 05:02 PM 5/10/06, Al Eisner wrote:
>On Tue, 9 May 2006, Bob Power wrote:
>
> > Jack Cole wrote:
> > > Bob's Steven's Creek Park trip reminded me that when
> > > I was there last Friday I noticed brand new "NO
> > > ENTRY KEEP OUT" signs all around the periphery of
> > > the Villa Maria Picnic area.
> >
> > Tamara Shear responded:
> > My understanding is that this path is actually a deer
> > trail that park visitors have made their own.
> > Unfortunately, the path eventually leads
> > the public onto private property. Park staff closed
> > the path for this reason. I hope this helps.
>
>If you are referring to the path that heads downhill, it certainly has
>not looked like a deerpath (although it may well have become more over-
>grown); but it assuredly leaves park property.  On the other hand, the
>old orchard is also now blocked with the same signs.  There the paths look
>like old roads, and it was a nice place to bird.  I had always thought
>it to be part of the Park, but that was based more on a natural assumption
>than on any solid information.
>                                                                 Al Eisner
>
>_______________________________________________
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>South-Bay-Birds mailing list      ([[email protected]])
>Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>http://plaidworks.org/mailman/listinfo/south-bay-birds_plaidworks.org


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
South-Bay-Birds mailing list      ([[email protected]])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://plaidworks.org/mailman/listinfo/south-bay-birds_plaidworks.org