From south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]] Thu Feb 10 17:21:11 2005
Received: from www.plaidworks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by plaidworks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1B1IkGm026841
	for <[[email protected]]>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:18:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pop-a065d10.pas.sa.earthlink.net
	(pop-a065d10.pas.sa.earthlink.net [207.217.121.251])
	by plaidworks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1B1HOAf026795
	for <[[email protected]]>;
	Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from user-38lc081.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.1.1]
	helo=oemcomputer)
	by pop-a065d10.pas.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1CzPQw-0006lP-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:17:23 -0800
Message-ID: <001201c50fd9$c98ce0a0$010156d1@oemcomputer>
From: "David Cook" <[[email protected]]>
To: "Dusty Bleher" <[[email protected]]>, <[[email protected]]>
References: <[[email protected]]>
	<003701c50f00$49f33760$0201a8c0@speedysnake>
Subject: Re: [SBB] WEBL question
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:34:09 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Cc: 
X-BeenThere: [[email protected]]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5b1
Precedence: list
List-Id: South Bay Birding <south-bay-birds.plaidworks.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.plaidworks.com/mailman/listinfo/south-bay-birds>, 
	<mailto:[[email protected]]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:[[email protected]]>
List-Help: <mailto:[[email protected]]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.plaidworks.com/mailman/listinfo/south-bay-birds>, 
	<mailto:[[email protected]]?subject=subscribe>
Sender: south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]]
Errors-To: south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]]

Hi Dusty
   From the information that I have reviewed, it seems that the Bluebird in
all three species was never listed as threatened. Conservation efforts were
under way to encourage the preservation of the Bluebird before such listings
were being made. It was estimated by some that the EABL population had
declined around 90% before serious conservation efforts were under way by
the Lanes in Canada and Zeleny in the US. I would think that it could be
said that they were threatened, but that their recovery is one of the truly
great successes in which humans have had an active part.
  David Cook
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dusty Bleher" <[[email protected]]>
To: <[[email protected]]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 3:37 PM
Subject: [SBB] WEBL question


> G'day all;
>
> I've got a question for the group.  Has anyone heard anything about the
> status of WEBL's as a species?  I was under the impression that they were
> considered "threatened".  But can't seem to find any supporting data.
>
> Any light anyone could shed on this issue would be MOST appreciated!
>
>
> Best regards,
> Dusty
> San Jose
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> south-bay-birds mailing list      ([[email protected]])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
http://www.plaidworks.com/mailman/options/south-bay-birds/justdave50%40earthlink.net
>
> This email sent to [[email protected]]

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
south-bay-birds mailing list      ([[email protected]])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://www.plaidworks.com/mailman/options/south-bay-birds/south-bay-birds-archive%40plaidworks.com

This email sent to [[email protected]]