From south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]] Thu Jul 1 11:38:59 2004 Received: from www.plaidworks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plaidworks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i61IaqsF023889 for <[[email protected]]>; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:36:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.Stanford.EDU (smtp3.stanford.edu [171.67.16.138]) by plaidworks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i61IZbQC023851 for <[[email protected]]>; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from match.stanford.EDU (match.Stanford.EDU [171.64.38.65]) by smtp3.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i61IZkFp008012; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:35:46 -0700 Received: (from bump@localhost) by match.stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i61GIOM22732; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:18:24 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:18:24 -0700 Message-Id: <[[email protected]]> From: Daniel Bump <[[email protected]]> To: [[email protected]] In-reply-to: <[[email protected]]> ([[email protected]]) Subject: Re: [SBB] ID help? References: <[[email protected]]> Cc: [[email protected]] X-BeenThere: [[email protected]] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5b1 Precedence: list List-Id: South Bay Birding List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]] Errors-To: south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]] That must be a baby Starling. Here's a web page of someone who raised a Starling. The plumages in July 1999 look comparable to this bird. http://www.starlingcentral.net/babystormy.htm The sillouette (short legs, long bill) is also consistent with Western Meadowlark but it looks like a Starling to me. Daniel Bump > I'd like to post this picture on my website, but I can't identify the bird. > OK, I saw it over the weekend in Sonoma County (Bodega Bay), not Santa > Clara. But this group is where I go to embarrass myself. > > http://www.geocities.com/tgrey41/MysteryBird.jpg > > The bird was hanging with Red-winged and Brewer's Blackbirds alongside a > pond. When I took the picture, I thought it was a female or juvenile > Brewer's Blackbird. But now that I've looked at the picture, that doesn't > look quite right (bill too thin at base, tail kinda short, that light gray > plumage -- and pink legs?). This is a crop from the original digital image, > sharpened but not otherwise edited. Picture taken at 6.15 PDT, so figure > some warming effect from the light. > > So what's the "duh"? _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. south-bay-birds mailing list ([[email protected]]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://www.plaidworks.com/mailman/options/south-bay-birds/south-bay-birds-archive%40plaidworks.com This email sent to [[email protected]]