From south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]] Thu Aug 21 18:55:47 2003 Received: from www.plaidworks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plaidworks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7M1qpkW014233 for <[[email protected]]>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp5.Stanford.EDU (smtp5.stanford.edu [171.67.16.30]) by plaidworks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7M1pdVK014183 for <[[email protected]]>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sametime.stanford.edu (sametime.Stanford.EDU [171.64.210.62]) by smtp5.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7M1pZvC014343 for <[[email protected]]>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:51:36 -0700 (PDT) To: [[email protected]] X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000 Message-ID: <[[email protected]]> From: "Tom Grey" <[[email protected]]> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:52:58 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on sametime/stanford(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 08/21/2003 06:53:01 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [SBB] Alviso sandpiper query X-BeenThere: [[email protected]] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2+ Precedence: list List-Id: South Bay Birding List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]] Errors-To: south-bay-birds-bounces+south-bay-birds-archive=[[email protected]] I was at New Chicago Marsh this morning after 10 am and found Peggy Don looking. We didn't have any luck with Ruff or Stilt Sandpiper in the first pond northeast of the intersection of the EEC road and the tracks. Later Frank Vanslager and Bob Reiling came back after venturing further north along the tracks, and we were able to piggyback on their finding the STILT SANDPIPER in the large pool west of the tracks -- the one near Spreckels and State, as Bob reported. The view was much better looking into it from Spreckels than from the tracks, as it was mostly over water, so less heat-hazy. Couldn't get any pictures of the STSA. But meantime I did take a couple of shots of whatever I could get to stand still enough for my awkward mode of digiscoping. Here are two of a bird I assumed to be a Least Sandpiper when I was photographing it. But then when I got home and looked at the pictures, the legs were black. Now that is probably either mud or an artifact of the lighting. The extent of brown on the chest still says Least to me. But looking at the pix I talked myself into thinking the bill shape and the rest of the plumage wouldn't be inconsistent with Semipalmated, so I wondered if I might have stumbled photograpically across one. I still figure an adult Least mostly molted to basic, but with some remnants of alternate. But instruction welcome. http://www.geocities.com/tgrey41/SandpiperQuery.jpg http://www.geocities.com/tgrey41/SandpiperQuery2.jpg Tom Grey www.geocities.com/tgrey41/index.html [[email protected]] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. south-bay-birds mailing list ([[email protected]]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://www.plaidworks.com/mailman/options/south-bay-birds/south-bay-birds-archive%40plaidworks.com This email sent to [[email protected]]